Prejudice, personal Stress, and Mental Health in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Populations

A difference between individual and team resources is usually perhaps perhaps maybe not addressed when you look at the coping literature. It’s important to differentiate between resources that run on the specific degree (e.g., character), by which people in minority teams vary, and resources that work on an organization level and are usually offered to all minority users (Branscombe & Ellemers, 1998).

Like other people who deal with general anxiety, LGB individuals utilize a variety of individual coping mechanisms, resilience, and hardiness to withstand experiences that are stressfulAntonovsky, 1987; Masten, 2001; Ouellette, 1993). But additionally to such personal coping, team degree social structural facets might have psychological state advantages (Peterson, Folkman, & Bakeman, 1996). Jones et al. (1984) described two functions of coping achieved through minority team affiliations: to permit stigmatized persons to have social surroundings in which they’re not stigmatized by others also to provide help for negative assessment associated with the minority group that is stigmatized. Personal assessment concept recommends another mechanism that is plausible minority coping (Pettigrew, 1967). People in stigmatized teams that have a solid feeling of community cohesiveness evaluate by themselves in comparison to other individuals who are like them in the place of with people of the dominant tradition. Continue reading Prejudice, personal Stress, and Mental Health in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Populations